To further indicate that every single statement that lies within those descriptions is disputed may be going overboard and would show too much negative bias to the subject matter than it already has. The episode descriptions explain what each episode is about and that's all they need to do. Dougweller ( talk) 21:08, 18 June 2011 (UTC) I think a reader will get the idea that the subject matter of the show in general is disputed. The only thing I've ever been very unhappy with has been descriptions of episodes that referred to disputed subjects in an npov way (ie a reader might not realise that they were disputed) and I haven't been very involved in editing this article. Cyberia23 ( talk) 20:15, 18 June 2011 (UTC) I'm happy with the changes. It's fine the way it is, honestly I'm not going to spend my weekend arguing over this show or people like DougWeller.
#ANCIENT ALIENS SEASON 1 ONLINE TV#
Any objection to me moving and recasting? - Nuujinn ( talk) 20:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC) I moved the criticism section - usually the list of episodes are the last thing in a TV article. The are others who worked in the field besides him.
#ANCIENT ALIENS SEASON 1 ONLINE SERIES#
Only the pilot episode is about Erich von Däniken book, not the whole series as the beginning text is implying. What do others think? - Nuujinn ( talk) 19:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC) My thought is we move it to the Critical reception section, and that we trim back a bit the linking to the book-this article is just about the show, and it's good to say that the show is based on the book, but unless a reliable source says something like "the show is based on a book that was discredited", linking the two passes to far towards WP:OR. Hrafn Talk Stalk ( P) 02:04, 25 December 2010 (UTC) Is Disinfo a reliable source? Neither the cited page, nor its Wikipedia article gives any impression of reliability. 36 Semi-protected edit request on 2 August 2017Ĭan we link to the Antikythera mechanism and wreck and the Baghdad Battery in the pilot's summary? serioushat 00:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC) Disinfo as source.34 Detailing the Commentators/Researchers that have participated in this project.32 Is the use of the word 'researchers' appropriate?.
0 kommentar(er)
